The Hong Kong that raised me

As soon as I heard the landing gear deploy, a burst of happy memories came rushing back. I hadn’t set foot in Hong Kong in ten years, which explained the sudden, overwhelming wave of excitement that hit me the moment we touched down.

Hong Kong holds a special place in my heart. From 1982 to 1994, our family spent every Christmas break there before returning home to Manila for New Year’s Eve. Like many of us back then, I grew up viewing Hong Kong as a capital of consumption, a place whose sole purpose seemed to be indulging Filipinos with brands that weren’t readily available back home.

As souvenirs, I would always collect the free city guides from hotel rooms and hoard maps and flyers from the airport. I’d even pack away unused wet towelettes from Cathay Pacific or PAL flights, carefully preserving all these ephemera in my red plastic suitcase.

Shopping for toys was always the ultimate treat. By the end of each trip, I’d be taking home handheld mini arcade games like Pac-Man, Donkey Kong, and Cobra, along with Family Computer cartridges that I couldn’t wait to pop into my console back home. At night, we’d head to Mong Kok for cheap finds. Watching annoyed traders react as we bargained fake goods down to half-price, walking away until they chased us down to give in, was always a sight to behold.

One special place we visited every single trip was Hengton Perfumes, a tiny perfume store in the Holiday Inn Arcade on Nathan Road. It was owned by Newton, a short, stout, bald Chinese man. He was a jolly person, always smiling, a total opposite from most Cantonese merchants we have dealt with. Right beside his shop was a funhouse-style novelty store for kids and adults. That was where I’d stock up on stink bombs to pop in our school canteen. Once, I set one off inside Mrs. Rita’s store, a communal lunch spot across from my elementary school, and within seconds, students and their yayas came bursting out, nose covered, complaining about the stench.

I also bought itching powder and sneezing powder, and I claimed quite a few victims with the itching powder, including Newton himself. One afternoon, while my family was browsing another store, I walked into Hengton alone. I called Newton over to the entrance of his tiny shop and told him I wanted to look at his head. Confused, he leaned down anyway. The moment he lowered his head, I sprinkled a pack of itching powder over his bald scalp and bolted. I didn’t know any better; I was eight years old. Minutes later, my family and I returned to his store, only to find him furiously wiping his head with a towel while telling my parents what their naughty kid had done.

Newton and his family eventually left Hong Kong around 1992 in anticipation of the British handover to China in 1997. On the day of the handover itself, I was sitting in my college class, discussing the massive changes that lay ahead for the territory.

It wasn’t just the shopping I looked forward to, either. There were the cartoons on cable TV: The Smurfs and Disney classics, all dubbed in Cantonese. Then came the thrill of watching trailers of pay-per-view adult films as a young kid, alongside obscure short videos warning about haunted hotel rooms where guests had died.

Hong Kong wasn’t just a playground for shopping; it was also a place of learning. This was where my dad taught me to wait a few days and canvas prices before buying so I could get the best deal. I remember having to wait a whole day before I could buy a pair of high-top L.A. Gear shoes I’d spotted on day one. It was the longest 24 hours of my life.
This was also where I first realized I wanted to be seen. During a meeting with a banker when I was seven or eight, my parents forgot to introduce me. It made me feel so utterly invisible that I sat sulking on the sofa. That was my first lesson in what it felt like to be ignored.

Yet, it was also where I first tasted independence. By the age of twelve, I was navigating the city on my own, shopping, bargaining, and canvassing. Once, while browsing video games, I accidentally bumped a game case, causing it to fall. The shopkeeper yelled at me, demanding I pay for the damages. I didn’t back down; I talked right back, telling him nothing was broken and it was just a case.

Now that I’m back, I am still thrilled by its unrelenting consumerism: the mix of small gadget shops and massive retail stores, the street peddlers, the Indian tailors, and the Chinese shop owners. Yet, I realize I don’t miss the Hong Kong of ten years ago; I miss the Hong Kong of the 1980s. I miss seeing people dressed smartly and fashionably on the way to work, walking at a frantic pace with hair so heavily gelled and sprayed it felt harder than concrete blocks. I miss the loud, fiery conversations in market places that used to startle me as a child.

Hong Kong holds a place in the heart of most Filipino ’80s kid. It may have changed in how it looks and moves, but its materialistic soul remains delightfully intact.

The road that knows you

In my 20s I was chasing everything life has to offer, success, fame, and everything that can stroke the ego. At home on weekends means being a loser and being out means living the life. I can say that I have a fair share of success and a bit of fame but perspectives change as your view becomes wider. Between then and now, I find myself choosing something more predictable, something more quiet, something less than extraordinary like a morning cup of coffee after the kids have gone to school or my rosary enroute to work.


We have built our lives chasing the next big thing, every country to visit, every new experience to collect, every latest product to try. Experience has become a currency, a status symbol. The more you have, the better you are as a person. We have been infected, as it were, by the YOLO virus: you only live once, so fill it with as much novelty as possible.
But I wonder what happens when we do the exact opposite.


We dismiss the ordinary and the repetitive as mundane, as if life’s meaning is found only in the novel and the exciting. But consider the fisherman who casts the same net every morning. The artist who sits at the same desk, at the same hour, and paints. The chef who has cooked the same dish for decades and still finds something to improve. The mother who wakes before everyone else to prepare breakfast. The father who takes the same route to work, year after year, not because he has no imagination, but because he has people depending on him. These are not people who have given up on life. These are people who have found it.


Repetition and doing the ordinary does something to us. We become what we do repeatedly. The fisherman not only catches the fish, he learns about the sea. The mother not only makes breakfast, she becomes the person her children can count on.


The ordinary is not the enemy of meaning. It is meaning, the form meaning takes when it decides to stay.


There is something in the word itself worth holding. Routine comes from route, a road, a path worn by repeated passage. A routine, then, is not a rut. It is a road that knows you. You have walked it so many times that it remembers your weight, your pace, your pauses. It does not surprise you. It does something better: it receives you. And in that receiving, in that dailiness, mastery quietly forms.


Consider the salmon. It swims upstream against everything, spawns, and dies. But its death is not a failure. It is the final act of a complete life. Its body feeds the river, the bears, the trees, the very water that will carry the next generation. Nothing is wasted. Nothing is left over. It served its purpose fully, without remainder.
Perhaps that is what the ordinary asks of us. Not drama. Not novelty. Just to show up, to do the thing, and to feed what comes after us.


In the ordinary there is no rush, only the slow accumulation of a life that knows what it is doing. In the routine, nothing is new, but everything is deeper. We spend so much of our lives looking for somewhere to arrive, when the road beneath our feet has been the destination all along.

WHEN IS WINNING A TERRIBLE TEACHER?

The Victor

I am able to have a chance to observe and compare gameplay and style of different tennis players in different age groups both locally and internationally.

Generally, most 12 year olds would use lob in their game play to take advantage of their opponents’ short height. As they progress in age the ideal game play should be deep, paced and heavy spin or strong flat balls. In other countries, this is how it is but in the Philippines, game style for many, not all, is stuck in slow spin, or lob, prioritizing win over development. And this makes winning a terrible teacher.

A win is a win and it is a record. But a scoreboard is not a mirror. It tells you who won, not how, and certainly not whether the game you played today is the game that will still work at the next level or the one after that.

The lob that wins a 14-and-under local tournament is the same lob that gets punished at 16, when opponents are taller, faster, and have learned to put away anything short. The spin that frustrates a Filipino peer becomes a free setup ball for a Malaysian or Indonesian junior who has been trained to step in and drive. What worked becomes a liability. The player doesn’t suddenly become worse the level simply exposes what was always missing.

This is the quiet cost of prioritizing the score. A scoreboard tells you who won. It does not tell you why, or whether it will hold. A player who wins by making the other person uncomfortable has learned one thing: avoidance. A player who wins by executing, by hitting the right ball at the right time with conviction has learned something that travels with them.

Development asks a different question than competition does. Competition asks: did you win today? Development asks: are you becoming someone who can win at the next level, and the one after that? These are not always the same question, and in junior tennis, they are often in direct conflict.

The problem is that coaches, parents, and players feel the score. They do not feel the development gap, not yet. It shows up later, quietly, when the player plateaus and no one can quite explain why someone so experienced seems to have run out of game.

What you build at 14 is what you have at 18. The habits, the instincts, the shots you trust under pressure, these are not things you add later. They are either in the body or they are not. And the body learns from what it does repeatedly in the moments that matter, not from what it practices in the safety of a drill.

This is why courage is not just a character virtue in tennis. It is a technical requirement. The player who never goes for the big forehand in a match never really has one not in the way that counts. The shot has to be attempted, missed, adjusted, and attempted again under real pressure before it belongs to them.

But courage alone is not enough. Tennis is also a problem-solving sport, played in real time, against an opponent who is actively trying to take away what you do best. The player who has learned to drive the ball with conviction still has to reckon with the lober who refuses to give them pace, or the pusher who turns their aggression into errors. Playing your game is the foundation but the complete player knows when the match is asking for something different, and has the presence of mind to give it. Adaptability is not the opposite of conviction. It is what conviction looks like when the situation changes.

So when is winning a terrible teacher? When the win requires nothing of you. When it rewards avoidance over execution, safety over growth, the score over the game being built underneath it. Winning teaches well only when it is hard-earned, when it demands that you find a shot you weren’t sure you had, solve a problem you hadn’t seen before, stay in a point longer than is comfortable. That kind of winning builds something. The other kind just flatters you.

Play your game, win or lose. Not because winning doesn’t matter. But because the game you build now is the only game you’ll have when it matters.

Prayer Turns Us

I have seen how people pray. When I was young, we would go to Baclaran on Wednesdays and there I’d witness people walking on their knees, people who look very sad touching feet of saints. I got the impression that prayers are for sad people and people with problems.

Then here comes pastors and even Bo Sanchez, Mike Velarde on TV who would ask people raise their umbrellas, wave their bandanas and ask for money and healing. One time I was in a charismatic meeting and there was a pastor who would do slain in the spirit and people would fall on their back, some shaking and others fainting. Then at times I’d hear people say to religious people, Panay dasal mo, hindi naman nagbabago ugali mo.

The thing about prayer is that we think it must be heartfelt, sad, dramatic, or emotional to be effective. This is why when I first heard mass in the US as a teen I was surprised how joyful they sing the papuri song in English compared to how people sing it here, maawa ka, maawa ka with matching sad face. I think that’s a misconception, and it only makes prayer and evern praise harder for us. Another thing about prayer is that we expect an answer, because it is a conversation.

To a young boy like me, because of what I saw, prayer became mysterious and confusing; to a young teen, it became cheap. To an adolescent, it made God weird, it made God a genie, it made God transactional.

One lesson I wish I had learned earlier is that prayer is not measured by intensity of feeling. Tears are not proof of faith, just as dryness is not proof of God’s absence. Some of the sincerest prayers are spoken through joy, gratitude, boredom, confusion, the ordinary routines of life, or even silence. The saints often wrote about seasons when God seemed distant, yet they continued to pray. Prayer is not effective because we feel strongly; it is effective because God is present. What matters is not whether our hearts are stirred, but whether our hearts are willing.

This is why a sharing by Dennis a few months ago struck me. He spoke about his grandmother, whom he would often see praying. Looking back, I think what moved me was not what she felt while praying, because no one could know that, but that thing which Dennis calls her posture of prayer: her faithfulness, her consistency, her willingness to keep turning toward God. Sometimes the deepest prayers are not dramatic moments but ordinary acts of showing up before God day after day.

As I mature in my faith, which I hope I am, I now understand what they mean when they say prayer is a conversation: converse and convert. To converse is to talk to God, to be grateful and to ask for petitions. This is where majority of us are at. The second is where our prayer life should bring us – convert, and that entails listening and hearing in quiet solitude. It may be in your room or in a chapel as advised by my spiritual director. But it requires that we know the God of the Bible from priests or theologians so that we do not project our biases.
In the convert part, this is where prayer teaches us to hope, because in prayer we beg and ask and wait for the answer, and in prayer we practice faith in God who we do not see, and in prayer we become charitable because we ask not just for us but for others as well. So prayer fully converts us when we accept God’s will when we do not get what we want and when we let go of control.

Those two words, converse and convert, share the same Latin root, vertere, “to turn.” To converse is to turn toward someone in speech; to convert is to be turned around, turned into something else. We can say that prayer is turning to God as we are turned around by God. And this converse and convert is what can turn our prayer from commanding the genie-god to listening to the Biblical-God who longs for our ears and our hearts.

I felt the truth of this most clearly in a season of my life I’d rather not detail here. I have spoken and listened to God many times, I poured my heart out and stayed quiet trying to listen to words. No words were heard, no burning bush, but there were grace and peace in my heart after I let him do his will and not mine.

I think back to those scenes from my childhood: knees on the pavement of Baclaran, sad faces, hands reaching for the feet of saints. Those were postures of begging, and begging is real, but it is half of the conversation. What I couldn’t see as a boy was the other half, the turning that happens while praying in silence, where nothing visible changes and yet something does.

So I end this by encouraging you in your quiet moments of prayer with God: as you turn around, tell Him—
I need you now tonight
And I need you more than ever
And if you only hold me tight
We’ll be holding on forever

So Turn around.

I have the power

I loved the Masters of the Universe live-action movie. It brought me right back to my 1980s childhood.

This is the kind of message we don’t often see in movies today—the classic 80s “never say die” spirit, where the protagonist faces impossible challenges and transforms through courage, determination, and sheer willpower.

Last June 12, we watched the movie as a family. We do this from time to time whenever there’s a good film showing in theaters. Movie tickets now cost around ₱600 per person, a far cry from the ₱25 tickets I remember growing up. But hey, this one was worth it.

In the middle of the movie, Iuri even took a photo of me completely absorbed in what was happening on screen. The film had its dull moments—some scenes felt longer than necessary, with too much dialogue. But then again, if you grew up watching cartoons in the 80s, you know there were plenty of dialogues and scenes that could have been edited down too.

One thing I appreciated was how the director managed to bring the cartoon’s humor into the live-action adaptation. Skeletor’s laugh and comedic moments felt authentic and captured a side of the character that many of his villains never quite matched.

The best part, of course, was when He-Man raised his sword and shouted, “By the power of Grayskull… I have the power!” That gave me goosebumps.

It was a fun movie that took me back to my childhood. It may not be everyone’s cup of tea, but I certainly enjoyed it. In fact, when the movie ended, I raised my water bottle and shouted, “I have the power!”